Welcome to Michael's blog. Michael Andrew, (aka Michael The Maven) is a freelance producer, photography instructor, tech innovator, and when needed, disaster aid specialist. Disclaimer: Michael is a participant in Bhphoto & Amazon affiliate programs that provides an advertising commission if you purchase through links on this website.
Canon just announced its brand new flagship last, night so I recorded my thoughts this morning from Maui in terms of why Canon has a new king. This is the best of the best sports shooting cameras, and at the time of this recording, nothing else comes close. Ill outline its strengths and weaknesses, its competitive advantages, and how it will affect advanced semi-pro shooters as well as high end pros. Everything in this video is 100% my own thoughts, I have no affiliation with Canon or any camera manufacturer, and really looking forward to the final release of the camera. Hopefully Ill be able to test it hands on soon!
With all the problems we have been seeing in resolving power of the Canon M6ii and the Canon 90D, I get a few questions each week asking me this marks the end of the Mega Pixel War. The short answer is Yes, we have reached a point where camera manufacturers have crammed so many mega pixels into sensors that to add more will create a host of problems, namely with lens resolving power.
The long answer is a little bit more tricky, as every system has its own limits and constraints in regards to lens mounts. I expect the R line to be very good, but not much better than the 75-85 MP of the expected high MP R coming in 2020, the reason? Physics. Its essentially maxed out at that point.
Could we see a 40 MP APSC or 100 Mega Pixel Full Frame Sensor (35mm equivalent)? Of course it can be made, but it would require very high performing lenses, and even then diffraction would be setting in even earlier. Economically, it would be a specialist type of ecosystem, not one for the masses.
There are other ways to get into higher MP images, such as using sensor shift / multiple exposures, but lots of strange things start happening when we get into very tight pixel pitches, so, no- its not likely the Mega Pixel war will go much further. Camera manufacturers will have to find new ways to compete. Enjoy!
Great question from a viewer recently, is whether or not different lenses have different color casts. For most of us, it really wont matter, but for some of us, it will make a difference to know when and why this happens! Enjoy!
If you are struggling to learn your camera, check out one of my many camera crash courses:
With the Canon 90D and M6ii came complaints that older existing zooms were no longer producing sharp results as they had on previous older cameras, with larger pixel pitches. In todays video, I am going to give you some basics of diffraction and how sensors can out resolve lenses. Knowing how this works will better arm you to plan for your next high megapixel density sensor! Enjoy!
If you enjoy my teaching style, be sure to check out my camera training videos:
Thank you to our sponsor http://www.lensprotogo.com for providing the D850, D500 and 24 1.4 Lens used in this test! This was not a paid promotion, they simply lent me the cameras and lens. If you need a fast rental, they are my go to!
For many years I have had questions about DXO Marks various camera tests and scores. The thing that bothered me the most was that they were publishing data and I was never really certain as to how they were coming up with some of their numbers, and I know many others feel the same way I do.
One of their most controversial metrics is the P-Megapixel or Perceptual Megapixel which for the life of me I always refer to incorrectly as the "perceived" megapixel score. It is a cool idea in that it is trying to give viewers an idea of the amount of resolution they would get in a final image when pairing a lens to different sensors. There are a huge number of problems with this idea, the biggest of which we still aren't exactly sure as to what formulas they are using to come up with these numbers.
Heres the bigger problem, new camera owners, or those shopping for a new lens often use these scores to try to get an idea of how "sharp" a lens is. This is not what the P-Mpix score is, which is instead trying to to describe how many megapixels one would get when using the combination. I actually stumbled upon this accidentally when I was testing lens sharpness on a full frame D850 in crop mode compared with a D500. I chose those cameras because they have similar pixel pitch, a variable that impacts diffraction (and therefore image sharpness) and what I learned was, same lens, on similar sensor designs (including pixel pitch) equals similar sharpness.
While DXO doesn't have D850 test scores that I could find, there were scores for the D810, a 36MP camera. The D810's PMPIX Score was 23, compared to the D500s 13 (out of 21).
Crunching the Numbers we get:
23/36.3 = 63.3%
13/20.9 = 62.2%
So this leads me to believe they are taking their tests and applying a "lens penalty" to the overall resolution of the camera. This is whacky because it means if you start with a higher MP camera, the score will be higher, regardless of the actual lens and image performance.
Granted, the D810 is not the same as the D850 and there are likely some differences, but what we can gather from this, is that even when the crop areas are similar to the naked eye, their PMPix scores are vastly different.
This is why we cannot consider DXOs PMpix score as a lens sharpness metric, it should be viewed as a total image detail metric. Having it labeled as "sharpness" is very misleading to the general public, because without doing a similar test, there is no way to really know, and the perception is this PMPIX is a lens sharpness score. It isn't.
I invite anyone interested to download my test images and compare them for yourself: https://www.dropbox.com/s/xs844ccv2wsisd2/Finals-D850-D500.zip?dl=0
There are a huge number of valuable and other interesting questions that can be asked about image sharpness, and Ill have at least 2 more videos on the topic coming soon!
By request, I am answering the question of what are the best lens options for a new Canon R or RP owner. Taking into consideration that we can adapt existing EF lenses, that many Canon lens profiles are supported, and the R / RP are not great for sports shooting, here are my suggestions, as well as an overview of each of the existing RF mount lenses at the time of this recording. Also, please note Canon has about 10 more RF lenses coming very soon.
If you are struggling to learn your R or RP, check out my free tutorials on youtube!
If you want an advanced course on the RP, check out my Crash Course on my website!
This is not a movie for kids or even teenagers. It vulgar and appalling in many ways, but the reason it is so good is because it is an unapologetic, truthful essay on human nature, desire and flaws. The title is not about precious gems, it is about the characters, each of which have at least one redeeming quality and one incredible weakness. It is highly symbolic and many will be able to relate to it. Very thought provoking. Its hard to recommend because of some of the scenes that are just shocking and inappropriate, but its portrayal of true human nature makes it very strong.
For many years Canon has been resting on the laurels of their Brand name and success. It has opened the door for Sony and other camera companies to step into the video markets. Canon finally responded with the EOS R in 2018, but its about to get absolutely bonkers for Canon. Here's why! Enjoy!
We had a group member find a great deal on a Canon 24-70 2.8 LII lens on Walmart.com. Turns out, it was too good to be true! Here is what to look for and why a good deal might hurt you in the long run!